Operated by Ieldas Inc. · Independent methodology · Affiliate-supported. Read our ownership & funding disclosure and how every figure is verified.
GLP1ProviderFinderUS price records
HomeBlog › The Teaser Index

Journal · Updated 2026-08-11

The Teaser Index: Advertised vs True GLP-1 Prices Across 37 Programs, Measured

By the GLP1ProviderFinder Research Desk · Medically reviewed by Dr. A. Goher, MD · Last reviewed 2026-08-11 · How we verify

The short answer

Across the thirty-seven programs in our database, the advertised GLP-1 price and the true all-in monthly cost diverge by zero to seventy-eight percent, and the gap is manufactured by exactly five mechanisms: term-anchoring (advertising the twelve-month rate as if it were the price), dose-anchoring (advertising the starter dose's price), fee-exclusion (advertising the medication without the mandatory membership), funnel-gating (advertising a number the checkout personalizes upward), and promo-anchoring (advertising a rate with an expiry the ad doesn't mention). The widest measured spreads right now: TMates tirzepatide at seventy-eight percent (a $167 twelve-month headline against $297 month-to-month), Found at seventy-one percent ($169 prepaid-year headline against $289 monthly), ShedRx at forty-five percent ($199 start against $289 maintenance), Mochi and Ivim near forty percent once memberships are counted. The defense is one line: ask for the all-in monthly price, at the maintenance dose, on the shortest term you'd actually accept — in writing at checkout. This page is that line, expanded and measured.

The five mechanisms, named

Term-anchoring is the market's favorite: the headline is the longest commitment's rate. TMates' $158/$167 figures are twelve-month rates against $249/$297 month-to-month; HealthRX's ninety-nine-dollar semaglutide is the twelve-month plan with the shortest available term at one thirty-three; Trimi and LumiMeds' one twenty-five requires the entire year — roughly fifteen hundred dollars — billed upfront. Nothing here is dishonest when labeled, and our own rankings use these rates in the annual categories; the failure mode is comparing someone's twelve-month rate against someone else's monthly. Dose-anchoring advertises month one: ShedRx's one ninety-nine becomes two eighty-nine at maintenance, and Fifty 410's famous one thirty-three has no published maintenance figure at all — the pure case, unrankable by our methodology. Fee-exclusion advertises the medication and omits the mandatory membership: Mochi's one ninety-nine tirzepatide is two seventy-eight with its seventy-nine-dollar membership, Ivim's two-oh-three is two seventy-eight with its seventy-five, Hims' three ninety-nine Zepbound is five forty-eight with its one forty-nine — spreads of thirty-seven to forty percent hiding in a line item. Funnel-gating — Sprout, Synergy, Strut, Yucca's post-intake rate — puts the real number behind the intake, which is why those rows sit unrankable in our tables. And promo-anchoring: NexLife's one sixty-nine against its two-fifteen standard card is the market's clearest current example — and, labeled with its August 31 end date and Flat Forever terms as it is, also the model for how a promotional price is advertised honestly.

Where the ad and the checkout actually match

Credit where the data puts it: a meaningful cluster of programs advertise a number that survives to checkout intact. Yucca's two fifty-eight tirzepatide, SkinnyRx's and OrderlyMeds' two ninety-nine, Care Bare Rx's one ninety-nine, bmiMD's plan ladder (where the price varies by term, stated, and never by dose), Henry Meds' one seventy-nine flat, and the brand channels — LillyDirect's dose ladder and NovoCare's pen pricing are exactly what the checkout charges, refill rules and all. The pattern across the honest cluster: flat-by-dose structures, no membership line item, and either no promotion or a labeled one. That pattern is checkable before you ever reach a checkout, which makes it the fastest pre-filter this market offers.

How our database neutralizes all five

Every mechanism above is defeated by normalization, which is the entire reason the database exists: one basis (all-in monthly, maintenance dose), start and maintenance recorded separately, memberships folded into every figure, promotional rates labeled with standard rates stored beside them, and funnel-gated programs marked unrankable rather than guessed at. The teaser spreads measured on this page aren't accusations — most are legal, several are labeled, and term discounts in particular are a legitimate structure — they're the measured distance between marketing and arithmetic, published so the arithmetic wins. When your captures land the funnel-gated programs' real maintenance numbers, this index gets its last column, and this market gets its first complete one.

Questions people ask

Why is my GLP-1 checkout price higher than the advertised price?

One of five mechanisms: the ad showed a long-term plan rate (term-anchoring), a starter-dose price (dose-anchoring), a medication price without the mandatory membership (fee-exclusion), a number the intake personalizes upward (funnel-gating), or a promotional rate near its expiry (promo-anchoring). The defense: ask for the all-in monthly price at the maintenance dose on the shortest term you'd accept, in writing at checkout.

Which GLP-1 programs have the biggest gap between advertised and real prices?

Measured on our records: TMates tirzepatide at 78% ($167 twelve-month headline vs $297 month-to-month), Found at 71% ($169 prepaid-year vs $289 monthly), ShedRx at 45% ($199 start vs $289 maintenance), and Mochi, Ivim, and Hims at 37–40% once mandatory memberships are added. Most are legal and several are labeled — the point is measuring the distance so comparisons use the same basis.

Which programs' advertised prices match checkout?

The flat-and-fee-free cluster: Yucca ($258 tirz), SkinnyRx and OrderlyMeds ($299), Henry Meds ($179), Care Bare Rx ($199), bmiMD's stated plan ladder, and the brand channels (LillyDirect, NovoCare), where the published dose pricing is exactly what's charged. The common pattern — flat by dose, no membership, no or labeled promotion — is checkable before checkout.

Is a 12-month plan rate a fake price?

No — it's a real rate for a real commitment, and our annual rankings use exactly those figures. It becomes misleading only when advertised as 'the price' against competitors' monthly rates, or when the upfront billing (Trimi and LumiMeds bill the full ~$1,500 year on day one) isn't obvious. Compare term-to-term, and read prepaid plans' refund clauses as carefully as their rates.

This article is pricing research, not medical advice. Verify figures at the provider's checkout. Nothing here is medical advice.